Dobe friend had a post of basically "share your controversial dog show opinions" and mine were as follows:
Breeds that require crop/dock should allow naturals to show next to them. At this point much of the world has it banned so by refusing to allow European or otherwise dogs to show alongside the Americans, all you do is further split the breed. Manmade decisions regarding ears and tails change nothing about the dogs genetically and thus should not be seen as a fault or DQ.
Breeds intended to do some form of work should have even a minor level of title or temperament test as a requirement for a CH. If your herding dog cannot pass a herding test, it doesn't matter how well it fits standard or moves or has correct angles. If it's really about breed preservation, then we need to address the problem of show dogs that can't work.
There should be written critiques. It is not helpful when the only knowledge you get is that the judge pointed at one dog and not the other. Give competitors more than "I guess the judge liked this dog". What made that dog better than all the rest? Show your work!
Things on that thread that I agreed with but did not come up with myself:
No more champions under 12 months old.
Get rid of the grand champion designation, as it has become an excuse to do nothing excwpt campaign a dog, contributing to the problem of show dogs that can't work.
Naturally occurring off colors should not be a fault or DQ if they are not associated with health problems.
Required health certs, custom to each breed, should be passed prior to issuing a CH if we're talking about 'evaluating breeding stock'.
Ban corrective grooming
Dog shows are not a black tie event and someone should be able to show in comfortable clothes because it's supposed to be *about the dogs*.
Too much fucking coat. (ok I say this one all the time but I didn't on this thread)
Beating other dogs is not the same as matching standard.